Printer-friendly version Send by email | | Title | Missed opportunity for creating value in negotiations: reluctance to making Integrative Gambit Offers | | URL | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.... | | Description | This study addresses a multi-issue negotiation agenda, where several issues are under consideration and parties have different priorities among these issues. The authors suggest that in such agendas loss aversion and within issue anchoring may constrain the configuration of offers that parties propose to each other during the course of negotiation. They specifically focus on offers in which negotiators self-propose to give the other party more than was demanded on one of the issues, while still maintaining or improving their overall value. We term such offers Integrative Gambit Offers ("IGO"s) and show that although making such offers improves integrative negotiation outcome, the frequency of making them is relatively low, and does not increase as negotiators gain experience with the task. | | Authors / Editors | Ritov, Ilana; Moran, Simone | | Date Published | October 2008 | | Download Citation | This citation can be downloaded in the following bibliographic database formats: Tagged; XML; BibTex |
|
Participate in Beyond Intractability
Beyond Intractability's new "CL3" system is a collaborative system for identifying, organizing, and sharing ideas for overcoming current limitations in our systems of governance. In order to assemble the most useful information on each topic, we rely on help from system users; we encourage you to rate the usefulness of this resource and post your comments. We are interested in your answers to the following questions:
-
Are you aware of any errors associated with the resource citation that should be corrected?
-
Does the resource actually address the topic for which you browsed and/or searched? (If not, we would appreciate your suggestions on how the resource should be recoded for more accurate location by future users.)
-
Are you aware of quality issues associated with this resource that might warrant an explanatory note or removal from the system? (While we strive to offer a variety of opinions on each issue, we do not want to include low-quality resources.)
-
Are you aware of other quality resources addressing this topic that should be included? (Please include basic citation information.)
We are looking for qualified people who are willing to help us develop this and other aspects of Beyond Intractability. We offer a variety of opportunities, which are described on the Comment & Suggest and Write & Edit pages.
|
|
|