Back-channel Communication in the Settlement of Conflict

View Resource Online
Title	Back-channel Communication in the Settlement of Conflict
URL	http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/...
Description	Secret back-channel communication is often employed in severe conflict to explore the feasibility of front-channel negotiation. It can also be used as an adjunct to front-channel negotiation when talks become deadlocked or as a substitute for front-channel negotiation. Its value lies partly in the flexibility and future orientation it brings to talks. In the prenegotiation phase, it also provides political cover, is cost-effective, does not require formal recognition of the adversary, and allows communication with adversaries who do not meet preconditions for negotiation such as a cease-fire. Intermediaries and intermediary chains are sometimes used in back-channel communication. Heavy reliance on back-channel communication can produce flimsy agreements that are too narrowly based or fail to deal with major issues. But this problem can be avoided if enough time is spent assembling a broad central coalition.
Authors / Editors	Pruitt, Dean G.
Date Published	2008
Download Citation	This citation can be downloaded in the following bibliographic database formats: Tagged; XML; BibTex

Participate in Beyond Intractability

Beyond Intractability's new "CL3" system is a collaborative system for identifying, organizing, and sharing ideas for overcoming current limitations in our systems of governance. In order to assemble the most useful information on each topic, we rely on help from system users; we encourage you to rate the usefulness of this resource and post your comments. We are interested in your answers to the following questions:

Are you aware of any errors associated with the resource citation that should be corrected?
Does the resource actually address the topic for which you browsed and/or searched? (If not, we would appreciate your suggestions on how the resource should be recoded for more accurate location by future users.)
Are you aware of quality issues associated with this resource that might warrant an explanatory note or removal from the system? (While we strive to offer a variety of opinions on each issue, we do not want to include low-quality resources.)
Are you aware of other quality resources addressing this topic that should be included? (Please include basic citation information.)

We are looking for qualified people who are willing to help us develop this and other aspects of Beyond Intractability. We offer a variety of opportunities, which are described on the Comment & Suggest and Write & Edit pages.