Beyond Intractability
Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionSend by emailSend by email
TitleAre Negotiators Overly Optimistic After All? It Depends on the Question and the Negotiation Structure
URLhttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm...
DescriptionThis study invokes the fixed pie bias to predict that negotiators show undue optimism when predicting distributive performance and undue pessimism when predicting integrative performance. To investigate this model, negotiators engaged in either a purely distributive or integrative negotiation and predicted their performance relative to the other party (inherently zero-sum) and in absolute terms (zero-sum for negotiators engaged in a zero-sum negotiation and integrative for negotiators engaged in an integrative task). Negotiators exhibited undue optimism when predicting performance relative to others regardless of negotiation condition. When predicting performance in absolute terms, negotiators exhibited marked overconfidence when engaged in zero-sum tasks but exhibited marked undue pessimism when engaged in integrative ones. This study also predicted and found that judgments of relative performance constrain indices of overconfidence and undue pessimism relative to absolute performance judgments. - Abstract
Authors / EditorsKass, Edward
Date Published2003
Download CitationThis citation can be downloaded in the following bibliographic database formats: Tagged; XML; BibTex
Participate in Beyond Intractability

Beyond Intractability's new "CL3" system is a collaborative system for identifying, organizing, and sharing ideas for overcoming current limitations in our systems of governance. In order to assemble the most useful information on each topic, we rely on help from system users; we encourage you to rate the usefulness of this resource and post your comments. We are interested in your answers to the following questions:

  • Are you aware of any errors associated with the resource citation that should be corrected?
  • Does the resource actually address the topic for which you browsed and/or searched? (If not, we would appreciate your suggestions on how the resource should be recoded for more accurate location by future users.)
  • Are you aware of quality issues associated with this resource that might warrant an explanatory note or removal from the system? (While we strive to offer a variety of opinions on each issue, we do not want to include low-quality resources.)
  • Are you aware of other quality resources addressing this topic that should be included? (Please include basic citation information.)

We are looking for qualified people who are willing to help us develop this and other aspects of Beyond Intractability. We offer a variety of opportunities, which are described on the Comment & Suggest and Write & Edit pages.

 

Beyond Intractability
Copyright © 2003-2012 The Beyond Intractability Project, The Conflict Information Consortium, University of Colorado;
All rights reserved. Content may not be reproduced without prior written permission.
Inquire about affordable reprint/republication rights.

Beyond Intractability is a Registered Trademark of the University of Colorado
Contact Beyond Intractability
Privacy Policy

The Beyond Intractability Knowledge Base Project
Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess, Co-Directors and Editors

c/o Conflict Information Consortium (Formerly Conflict Research Consortium), University of Colorado
580 UCB, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA -- Phone: (303) 492-1635 -- Contact
University of Colorado Boulder