Testing an Integrative Model of Respect: Implications for Social Engagement and Well-Being

View Resource Online
Title	Testing an Integrative Model of Respect: Implications for Social Engagement and Well-Being
URL	http://psp.sagepub.com/content/36/2/20...
Description	Prior research demonstrates that feelings of respect affect important aspects of group functioning and members' psychological well-being. One limitation is that respect has been variously defined as reflecting individuals' status in the group, degree to which they are liked by the group, and how fairly they are treated in interactions with group members. These different conceptions are integrated in the dual pathway model of respect. The authors tested the model's prediction that fair treatment from group members shapes attitudes toward the group and self via two distinct pathways: status and inclusion. Findings from a field study supported the model and yielded new insights: Whereas perceptions of status predicted social engagement, liking was more important in predicting well-being (especially among dominant subgroups). Discussion focuses on the utility of the dual pathway model for understanding how respect perceptions are formed and how they affect the welfare of groups and individuals.
Authors / Editors	Huo, Yuen J.; Binning, Kevin R.; Molina, Ludwin E.
Date Published	February 2010
Download Citation	This citation can be downloaded in the following bibliographic database formats: Tagged; XML; BibTex

Participate in Beyond Intractability

Beyond Intractability's new "CL3" system is a collaborative system for identifying, organizing, and sharing ideas for overcoming current limitations in our systems of governance. In order to assemble the most useful information on each topic, we rely on help from system users; we encourage you to rate the usefulness of this resource and post your comments. We are interested in your answers to the following questions:

Are you aware of any errors associated with the resource citation that should be corrected?
Does the resource actually address the topic for which you browsed and/or searched? (If not, we would appreciate your suggestions on how the resource should be recoded for more accurate location by future users.)
Are you aware of quality issues associated with this resource that might warrant an explanatory note or removal from the system? (While we strive to offer a variety of opinions on each issue, we do not want to include low-quality resources.)
Are you aware of other quality resources addressing this topic that should be included? (Please include basic citation information.)

We are looking for qualified people who are willing to help us develop this and other aspects of Beyond Intractability. We offer a variety of opportunities, which are described on the Comment & Suggest and Write & Edit pages.