Book Summary of Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action by Elinor Ostrom
Citation:
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Elinor Ostrom, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990), 270 pp.
This Book Summary written by: T.A. O'Lonergan, Conflict Research Consortium
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective
Action is an examination of the nature of the commons, and the evolution and
development of self-organisation and self-governance of those
commons.
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective
Action will be of interest to those who seek an understanding of common-pool
resources and their self-governance. Chapter one begins with an
examination of the commons and the presentation of three models of the
commons. The author discusses: the tragedy of the commons, the
prisoner's dilemma game, and the logic of collective action. The author
concludes with comparison of the Leviathan approach and the privatization
approach to the governance of the commons. To these two approaches the author
offers an empirical alternative.
The second chapter offers an institutional approach to the study of self-organisation
and self-governance in common-pool resource (CPR)
situations. Ostrom begins with an examination of the nature of CPR
situations and the theoretical basis for interdependence, independent
action and collective action in such situations. This is followed by discussion
of the problems of: supply, credible commitment, and mutual
monitoring. The author concludes with a focus upon framing the
inquiry, wherein appropriation and provision problems and
multiple levels of analysis are examined.
The next chapter is an analysis of long-enduring, self organised and
self-governed CPRs.
In this context Ostrom examines: Tobel, Switzerland, three Japanese
villages and two irrigation communities; a fifteenth century Spanish
one and a seventeenth century Philippine one. The chapter concludes
with a discussion of the similarities among enduring, self-governing CPR
institutions. The fourth chapter is an analysis of institutional change which
focuses upon commonly held water. The author examines the logic of water
rights and litigation arising therefrom. The focus is on water
allocation in the watersheds which supply Los Angeles with water.
Ostrom acknowledges the necessity of entrepreneurship in the polycentric
system of water rights governance in California.
The penultimate chapter is an analysis of institutional failures and
frailties with a focus upon: two Turkish inshore fisheries, California
groundwater basins, a Sri Lankan and a Nova Scotian fishery.
In the final chapter the author offers a framework for analysis of self-organising
and self-governing CPRs. The bulk of the chapter is a framework for
analyzing institutional choice. Ostrom examines the evaluation of: benefits,
costs, shared norms; and the process of institutional
change. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective
Action is a careful examination of the way in which commons have been
governed historically. From this examination, the author proposes a method for
governance which is empirical in nature.
|