<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>13</ref-type><contributors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Identity Of A Mediator</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">mediate.com</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">!I-Archive-CRInfo</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2001</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2001///</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.mediate.com/articles/dearborn.cfm</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The author writes &quot;concerning the new proposed definition of mediation in the February 2001 draft of the Uniform Mediation Act, which does not include a requirement of impartiality.&quot; She believes &quot;this omission results in the loss of an essential characteristic and core value of the mediation process, and fundamentally changes the role of mediators in dispute resolution.&quot;</style></abstract><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Neutrality, Professional Audiences, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Mediation, ADR Practitioners, Mediators, Articles, Commercial for profit business, impartiality</style></notes></record></records></xml>