Beyond Intractability
Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionSend by emailSend by email
Polarization


Laura Chasin suggests that that the degeneration of public discourse poses a threat to democracy.
William Ury begins explaining his role in trying to prevent a civil war in Venezuela, where the country is extremely polarized between those who support the president and those who oppose him. Like many other countries, it is essentially a conflict between the "haves" and "have nots." Before Ury came in and introduced his notion of "the third side" or people "for the whole," there was no room for neutrals-people were forced to take a side.
Terrence Lyons talks about the roles that diaspora populations can play both as spoilers and as dialogue participants.
What's an "extremist?" Roy Lewicki discusses how language can make a conflict better or worse.
Peter Coleman describes an abortion dialogue in which the parties came to respect each other and protect one another, but they were still very polarized on the abortion issue.



Rate this Resource
(Login Required)

Please hover over the stars below to submit your rating of this resource.

0
Your rating: None



Comment on this Resource
(Login Required)

 

Beyond Intractability
Copyright © 2003-2012 The Beyond Intractability Project, The Conflict Information Consortium, University of Colorado;
Beyond Intractability is a Registered Trademark of the University of Colorado
Contact Beyond Intractability
Privacy Policy

The Beyond Intractability Knowledge Base Project
Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess, Co-Directors and Editors

c/o Conflict Information Consortium (Formerly Conflict Research Consortium), University of Colorado
580 UCB, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA -- Phone: (303) 492-1635 -- Contact
University of Colorado Boulder