Beyond Intractability
Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionSend by emailSend by email
Democracy and Conflict Management




In the U.S.
Democratic processes are, in effect, one form of conflict management, where decisions are made by the electoral, legislative, and judicial processes. Two project participants discuss the importance of these processes, and observe problems that seem to be arising in American democracy.

Laura Chasin suggests that the degeneration of public discourse poses a threat to democracy.
Frank Dukes talks about the importance of public participation in conflict resolution processes.


In Post-Conflict Situations
Issues of democracy and conflict management are quite different in newly-forming democracies, as the following comments illustrate.

Terrence Lyons suggests that in post-conflict settings, there are risks associated both with premature elections and with waiting too long to hold elections.
Ray Shonholtz describes how his organization, Partners for Democratic Change, works to help newly-establishing democracies.
Terrence Lyons talks about the tension between maintaining stability and addressing past injustice in post-conflict reconstruction and democratization processes.



Rate this Resource
(Login Required)

Please hover over the stars below to submit your rating of this resource.

0
Your rating: None



Comment on this Resource
(Login Required)

 

Beyond Intractability
Copyright © 2003-2012 The Beyond Intractability Project, The Conflict Information Consortium, University of Colorado;
Beyond Intractability is a Registered Trademark of the University of Colorado
Contact Beyond Intractability
Privacy Policy

The Beyond Intractability Knowledge Base Project
Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess, Co-Directors and Editors

c/o Conflict Information Consortium (Formerly Conflict Research Consortium), University of Colorado
580 UCB, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA -- Phone: (303) 492-1635 -- Contact
University of Colorado Boulder