BeyondIntractability.org   BeyondIntractability.org
Beyond Intractability: A Free Knowledge Base on More Constructive Approaches to Destructive Conflict
   


Introduction: Leo Smyth, professor of management at National University of Ireland, suggests that deeply held frames inhibit creativity and make it difficult to visulize alternatives. One way to challenge these assumptions is to step back from one's own conflict and examine someone else's. Learning by way of analogy can help parties to become more creative without sparking defensiveness.


This rough transcript provides a text alternative to audio. We apologize for occasional errors and unintelligible sections (which are marked with ???).

Creativity
Leo Smyth
Professor of Management, National University of Ireland
Interviewed by
Julian Portilla
2003

A: Deeply held frames inhibit creativity, even without our being aware of it.  We simply cannot be creative. We don't have the psychic energy, or the freedom to look at alternatives, to visualize alternatives for joint gain. They do take energy, and we don't have that energy because it's robbed, if you like, by the pain of what it might do to some of our most dearly cherished assumptions.

Q: So, asking about what the future might look like is one way to get at those assumptions?  Do you have any ideas of other ways to get there?  

A: ...a lot of learning can take place by analogy.  You really need to step back from your own conflict in which you are immersed and look at somebody else's. I think that's part of what learning is.  These are not brand new ideas. I think many practitioners have known for years that working by analogy is a way of learning that sometimes brings insight in a way that the insight is blocked if you try to look at it on your own parish, if you like, or your own back door. Those kinds of things.

Q: So by analogy, you mean someone, say, steeped in the Northern Ireland conflict might take a step back and look at where for example and get some insight?

A: Oh yes, and it has been done and is being done where people look at other people's conflicts, and look at the dynamics.  Some of these dynamics are similar, and of course they will each have their own particular cultural, historical, political, and economic particularity. The essence of the thing is to stop the defense rushing in. The classic example is in the Old Testament. I forget which prophet he was, but he gets this message from God to go and confront King David about the fact that he has not only been living in sin with someone else's wife, but has actually caused her husband to be murdered or at least killed. 

From the point of view of walking up to your king and saying, "You know, excuse me, but I have a message from God for you," is a hard way of doing it. So he goes about it and says, "Your majesty, I would like justice for somebody in your kingdom.  This poor guy had only one sheep, but one of his neighbors who had about a thousand sheep, came by and stole his farm." That's not something that you want to push too far, because it would be offensive to women.  Of course, King David jumps up off his throne and says, "This is totally unjust.  Bring me this man and I will punish him as nobody's ever been punished."  The old prophet, he doesn't exactly say, "Gotcha!" but it boils down to the same thing. This is a classic example of learning by analogy.

Q:  So the idea, is some sort of self-revelation in that sense. You, ensconced in your own conflict would look at another conflict and say, "Wow!" I can't believe you're behaving like that and then in that second you say, "Wait a minute, that's exactly what we do!"

A: Right.

 
It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change. -- Charles Darwin

Featured Links
Organizations Making Noteworthy Contributions to Efforts to Promote More Constructive Conflict
Conflict Management Initiatives
Conflict Management Initiatives


Other Resources from
Beyond Intractability
Diplomacy and International Violence Prevention
Preventive Diplomacy and International Violence Prevention

"The concept and practice of violence prevention have evolved from being focused almost exclusively on the short-term interventions of preventive diplomacy, to a new, more comprehensive approach that can be defined as structural prevention and includes long-term initiatives targeting the root causes of conflict."

Nobel Peace Prize Winners

Lester Bowles Pearson
Lester Bowles Pearson

President of the 7th Session of the United Nations General Assembly, and 1957 Nobel Peace Laureate

Beyond Intractability Version IV
Copyright © 2003-2007 The Beyond Intractability Project
Beyond Intractability is a Registered Trademark of the University of Colorado
Project Acknowledgements

The Beyond Intractability Knowledge Base Project
Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess, Co-Directors and Editors
c/o Conflict Information Consortium (Formerly Conflict Research Consortium), University of Colorado
Campus Box 580, Boulder, CO 80309
Phone: (303) 492-1635; Fax: (303) 492-2154; Contact
University of Colorado at Boulder