|
Introduction:
Louis Kriesberg talks about the cross-cutting roles he has played in conflicts over the years. His academic role helped give him access and credibility, and his intervention activities enriched his research.
| |
This rough transcript provides a text alternative to audio. We apologize for occasional errors and unintelligible sections (which are marked with ???).
Playing Different Roles
Louis Kriesberg
Professor Emeritus, Sociology, University of Syracuse. Also author of numerous books on intractable conflict.
| |
Q: Tell me about roles, shifting roles,
and how people in this field can wear different hats at different times.
A: Well, I've been an academic basically for most of my life now, but in
doing that I've taught, done research, and written about that in a theoretical
position, but also in doing that I've also been a student throughout. I've
learned through the students, who I try to teach, through their experiences.
They've been very active in a variety of roles in a variety of countries. In
doing research, I've ended up kind of being what I'd call a
"quasi-mediator"-carrying information from one side to another, I'm an American, studying
US-Soviet relations, interviewing Soviet officials, academics and colleagues.
I'm giving them some information, and they're giving me some, which I then
communicate back to my compatriots. It's a kind of Track II work at a variety of
levels, sometimes quasi-official work with a sort of people to people
diplomacy. I'm doing research but I'm also doing Track II, I'm also subverting
them and also perhaps subverting my own country.
All of this is going on more or less at the same time, one's a little more
salient than another. I'm Jewish and working on Israeli-Palestinian conflict I'm
looking at it as someone who feels a sort of solidarity with Israel but also a
sort of solidarity with Palestinians. Just as an American I feel some sort of
solidarity with the Soviets, because that's where my parents came from. I would
walk around Moscow and Leningrad and people there looked like my relatives. The
fact that I can have some of that emotional connection also gave me some
credibility when I was doing research.
It also gave me access to people in these places because it was another kind
of bond that I would have because of my own history and my own actions,
sometimes as an advocate, because of all this time I would write op-ed pieces,
saying what our government or our people should do. I would not think of that as
being private, and knowing some of the people I interview, collect the data
from, I'd be aware that I'd said these other things, in these other roles and in
some ways this opened up opportunities to talk to people that I wouldn't have
had otherwise.
|