|
Introduction:
Nancy Ferrell talks about the difference between "power over" and "power with," and discusses how a transition can be made from the former to the latter during mediation.
|
This rough transcript provides a text alternative to audio. We apologize for occasional errors and unintelligible sections (which are marked with ???).
Power Over Versus Power With
Nancy Ferrell
Private mediator and trainer
|
[Full Interview]
Question:
What about
power being a factor? Do you have to provide some way where they can maintain power? We
sometimes talk about the difference between "power with" and "power over." Is there any way to
have power with instead of power over?
Answer:
...Before,
the power, the only way they perceive themselves as having any influence is by "power over."
You've got to create a new picture for them that they can buy into, and that's "power with," that
still has honor and influence. If you try to diminish them and their influence, it won't work. So if
you can reorient their paradigm to see that they have more influence inside the group and they
can make a difference here. "You've had an incredible influence on this community. What
you've done has made an incredible difference for these people, for the change in working
relationships. Let's look at it a different way. You can still have influence. You're very
important to this process." Many of them will see that and come along, if you'll help them create
that new picture. That's one of the gifts of the third party. You don't have anything to win or
lose, so they're not looking at you as a vested interest. Nobody else can play that role because
everybody else is suspect. But yes, I think everybody has to have a position of honor and have
some sense of personal empowerment.
|