|
Introduction:
Once dialogue participants have experienced a certain amount of
personal transformation, can these results be transferred to the broader community? This is
what Maire Dugan, Director of Race Relations 2020, calls the "re-entry question."
To address this concern, she recommends that dialogue workships be community-organized and that
they draw delegates from neighborhood associations, churches, and work places. This creates
a social infrastructure within which dialogues can operate more effectively.
| |
This rough transcript provides a text alternative to audio. We apologize for occasional errors and unintelligible sections (which are marked with ???).
Scale Up
Máire Dugan
Director, Race Relations 2020, Columbia, South Carolina
| |
Q: Generally there is a re-entry problem for people who come to
these dialogues, go through a certain amount of transformation, and then go back
into the community. Are probably some of those meant to deal with that
particular problem or how do you talk about that?
A: Actually, this is the only one that I know of that attempts to do that.
This aspect of it will not be as operational as I would have liked it to of been
until our next set of meetings. That is not only trying to deal with the
re-entry problem, but also trying to incorporate a community-organizing capacity
into this because the other side of that re-entry question is: How do you move
from individual transformation to social change?
What we attempt to do is to
draw the participants in as almost delegates, one of the things I like most
about Eau Claire is that there is a social infrastructure that is not available
in most cities. Eau Claire about 40,000 people that live in that section of the
city, about a quadrant of a middle sized city. There are thirty-nine
neighborhood associations, so the idea is to draw people as delegates from
neighborhood associations, churches, work places, or some organization from
within the community.
The idea is that that neighborhood association is giving
the person permission (by inviting that person) to participate in this on their
behalf and to bring their learning back to that neighborhood association.
Because the funding has been very limited our capacity to use that rubric has
been less than I would have liked it to be. However, I just know that I will be
told that I've gotten a small grant which will ask each of those neighborhood
associations to designate an officer to take part in a set of probably three or
four groups, which will start some time before June or early September. There
will be a mechanism for getting this back not only to the neighborhood
associations but to the council of those neighborhood associations on which I
currently sit as president elect which helps this.
Q: That's really interesting. You've tapped into the social structure,
this is something you must've considered before you started the dialogue. You
said, how am I going to do this transference from an individual level to a
larger scale?
A: Right, and it's a strategy for dealing both with what I think Heidi and
Guy call the scale-up problem and the re-entry problem. This person isn't just
there because I've picked them out or because they're self-chosen; hopefully,
this person will be there because they are sponsored by their association.
Having a little bit more support for this is also to be able to say to them
"if you want somebody to go with you for your report back to the group,
someone to help facilitate that, then we will arrange that as well depending on
their comfort level."
Another reason Eau Claire is an ideal place to start
this project is that not only is it a racially diverse neighborhood, it's a
racially diverse neighborhood that is chosen in a town meeting to include in its
mission for itself to maintain diversity. It is not just racial diversity
either, but also I think this is more economic diversity. I mean there are some
pretty large ritzy houses in the area, and then there are people who are paying
less than $300 a month for rent. The person who engages in this project with the
hope of improving race relations in the neighborhood engages with it not only
hopefully with some sort of connection to a neighborhood association, but also
with a mandate they can call upon in terms of a mission for the community as a
whole.
Q: Well, that's a great strategy, from the outside; I don't know that there
are that many communities that could have that great structure that you could
tap into.
A: No, but getting something off the ground is often more challenging than
duplicating it. Columbia, Eau Claire, and then maybe Richland County, I think
are more ideal places to start from. What you've highlighted from what I've said
in different parts in the conversation is that to draw another community into it
that doesn't have all that infrastructure is more possible.
|