|
Introduction:
Jayne Docherty of Eastern Mennonite University
suggests that metaphors typically play an important role in defining people's
worldviews. Identifying the metaphors that people use to describe their
situations can be a useful tool for revealing the
assumptions that underlie their values and beliefs. In this way, parties with
disparate worldviews can begin to co-construct a common reality.
| |
This rough transcript provides a text alternative to audio. We apologize for occasional errors and unintelligible sections (which are marked with ???).
Seeing and Not Seeing Reality
Jayne Docherty
Eastern Mennonite University
| |
Q: When you're sitting in a room and it's clear to you that people have
different world-views, how do you begin to get them to see their own world-views
and identify those as different from the other person's world-views?
A: A lot of this involves some creative practices, inviting people to work
with image, to work with metaphors, to take the metaphors they're using and ask
them to think carefully about well, what does that metaphor imply? If you take
the dominant metaphor for the forest right now, that the forest service has
used, as the forest as a farm, and you take people back through the development
of that metaphor and you say, "Gosh, the forest is a farm, do you think
that might be why the Forest Service is in the Department of Agriculture? Do you
think that might be why schools of forestry are in colleges of agriculture? Do
you think that might be why we talk about weed trees? OK, let's start with that
premise, the forest as a farm, what kind of farm is it? Is it a 19th century
family farm with rotating crops, holistic practices or is it major agro-business
in the mid-west with huge combines running across it? Oh!"
You invite
people to think through what that metaphor allows them to see and what it
doesn't allow them to see because every way of talking about the world is a way
of seeing and a way of not seeing reality. And very often it's what we're not
seeing that is the key to figuring out getting out of wherever we are. But you
have to see that you're not seeing it. So a lot of imagery, a lot of playing
with language, inviting people to try on new hats, not just positional hats
like, "you pretend you are the rancher, and you say rancher's
interests." It's more like let's look at the reality of the rancher's
world, let's play with the idea that if you're the rancher and you're trying to
manage for eco-system health what would you need to do differently, what
knowledge do you need that you don't have now, what information needs to happen
and how could we work towards a reality that includes ranchers as stewards of an
eco-system and can we create structures that would pay them to run fewer cattle
but to do eco system restoration work? Where does that happen? So what has to
happen is you really have to unlock creativity.
Q: In terms of the language that you can use in this kind of a process;
people have a hard time, especially those who are not in academics using words
like reality very casually, like we do.
A: I don't use that with them.
Q: Right, can you use metaphor, what language can you use, what language
can't you use?
A: Actually, you can actually use any of this, if you illustrate it, and the
one that seems to resonate with everybody I've ever tried it with is thinking of
the forest as a farm one. Say, ok when the pilgrims arrived here and the
Europeans arrived here, they talked about the forest as a farm. And most have
had, if they are US based and have grown up in this country, can go back to that
early American literature that they were forced to read in high school or
wherever and say oh wilderness, city on a hill, what do you do with a
wilderness? You tame it. Ok we did that. Then we needed charcoal and charcoal
comes from trees, so the forest became a mine, and these mining metaphors
dominated.
You can show how our talking about it over time, European settlers
talking about it changed and then we hit the west coast and we got the forest as
a farm and we got the forest service and the creation of all the national forest
lands. And people go, wow, oh that's a metaphor, that's how it shapes reality
and then they go kind of oh, ok. So, illustrate it and then you can invite them
to play because there is an element of playfulness in this that we often lose
sight of. We get so intense in the work that we do, "we really have to be
focused on problem solving" and let's keep on track, you have to
let people come back and play a little bit. And there are people who feel
threatened by this. They get threatened because of the recognition that we shape
reality; we don't just occupy it. But most people in my experience actually find
it very liberating. OH! I'm not a prisoner of this box that I was born into, or
this world as it is presented!
Q: How hard is it for people to come up with
their metaphors?
A: Oh, they use them all the time. You just pull it out while you're talking
to them and then you feed it back to them. It doesn't even have to be a
conscious thing. If you're facilitating and you become very metaphor sensitive,
and that's something we should be training ourselves, as practitioners to be
metaphor sensitive and it's something I work with some of my students on. When
you hear the metaphor, and you feed it back and you say let's explore that a
little bit more, you just say, ok, if the world really is X let's talk about
what that means.
Q: Finding the parallels where they might be appropriate?
A: Yes, what don't we know about that. And every metaphor has things that fit
and things that don't. So one thing that's interesting to do is to take some of
the solution language that people are using. Metaphors can also be used to paper
over differences. The stewardship metaphor is one that's when everybody's
tossing around, kind of we have to be, stewardship is the solution, you have
everyone leaving the room going, yeah brother, right you got it sister, we're
all going to be good stewards of the land. No one asked them to explore the
steward and the whole concept of stewardship and missing the dimension of
stewardship.
The metaphor of the steward that people haven't explored in the
environmental world is to whom does the steward answer? A steward is always
employed by somebody and answers to somebody. And when you start pulling people
down and saying, ok, when you start thinking of yourself as the steward, who's
the master? Who's coming back do you answer to? And then you start getting a
whole range of different answers. One person may say, its' the forest service
official and they say it's the American people, whatever they want, that's who
we answer to. Somebody else may say, the planet, Mother Nature. We answer to
Mother Nature and if we don't answer right, she's going to kick us in the but.
And they have all kinds of stories to tell you when that happened, fires,
floods, and etcetera.. OK, that's a little problem there. Someone may say, the
future, 7 generations out. And then you say well, how do we know what 7
generations out will need, what their interests are, how do we do that? A whole
level of conversation that hasn't happened
|