|
Introduction:
Sarah Cobb of ICAR tells the
story of three groups of Rwandan women. Each
group received grants from the UNHCR but they had very different results for
their projects. Sarah Cobb asserts
that the fate of their projects was pre-determined by the stories each group had
already developed for itself before the grants were disbursed. | |
This rough transcript provides a text alternative to audio. We apologize for occasional errors and unintelligible sections (which are marked with ???).
Rwandan Women
Sarah Cobb
Institute of Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University
| |
In this project in Rwanda there were three groups that had been funded by UNHCR
and they wanted some kind of an evaluation done on the groups.
So I went and met with the people. In
one group there had been about 350 widows to the genocide that had formed an
agricultural co-op that had gone on to do unbelievably interesting things
including the development of a craft enterprise, a school for the children, they
built something for grain and seed storage, and they were then training women in
other communities. The women were
just electrified, laughing and talking about building houses with pants on and
showing me how even though they had on skirts they could walk up and down
ladders. It was a quality of joy
and possibility in this group that was just phenomenal. They had a lot of success besides the stories that they told
about themselves, which were that they had overcome incredible hardship and have
come together as a group and respected each other across these ethnic lines.
They did it because they didnt have any choice.
And they did it because it was the right thing to do.
They benefited economically.
There was another group that had
gotten money from UNHCR and they had started a bottle co-op.
They had collected bottles from all around and stored them in this shed
that they built. They had been able
to purchase these things that you carry the bottles in.
Somebody broke into the shed and stole everything.
They sat in front of me saying that they have had incredible hardship.
Thank God somebody paid attention and tried to help us, but now the bad
people have come and we have been victims all along.
We are always going to be the victims.
There was a third group of men
and women of about 300. They had
money from UNHCR to develop a sunflower press enterprise.
So they had land that they were working on collaboratively as co-op and
they worked like dogs. The land
wasnt so great. They didnt
have all the right things they needed like fertilizer and stuff.
They managed to do an okay job but the UNHCR didnt deliver the press
in time and the crop couldnt be processed properly.
They couldnt get the product to market and the whole thing was a
fiasco. They blamed UNHCR for this.
This is again a story of an enormous amount of suffering but there
wasnt a story of coming together. There
wasnt a story of mutual respect. There
wasnt a story of mourning together. There
was a pragmatic count of what they had needed that they hadnt had.
I asked all three groups what happened in the genocide?
The third group said there was
incredible poverty that then led to people needing to take control.
They did that because they wanted money so the genocide was caused by
power, but fueled by greed. I would then ask whats going on now?
Well you know we arent really sure and clearly nobodys thinking
about us. Again we ended up with a
story about victimization. Second
group said well people went insane. Why
did they go insane? We dont
know. This is the bottle group.
We cant make any sense of it. We
watched our children and fathers die. We
dont have any ways of understanding that.
How does that relate to whats going on now?
Well, it could happen again. We
dont understand anything. The
first group said that there was an enormous amount of poverty and ignorance.
Then what happened? After
poverty and ignorance people got terribly afraid.
They were afraid over a period of years and they got more and more and
more afraid. Then they became angry
but they werent really angry they were just really afraid.
So the genocide happened because of fear. So how does that relate to now?
Well, we are fighting fear, we teach the children how to do skills, we
have a craft thing, we have an agricultural thing, we do training of other
women, we are empowering people, and we are working to reduce fear.
When I reported back to UNHCR it
was really clear. The question is
whether or not the group had that story in place before they got the money in
the first place. You give all three
groups money, they land in the context of the given story of whats going on
and then its no surprise that the money ends up following the story, not
transforming the story. I think
thats what happened in the first group was a combination of things.
I asked them how did their group form?
We had the possibility of a grant so we came together to see what would
happen and how we could do things. This
is just what they all said. But
this group said in addition to that that they realized they didnt know each
other. Then we realized we had so
much suffering in common. We spent
the first period of time just mourning. None
of the other groups did that. I came away from this with a fundamental interest
in thinking about mourning processes. I
wrote to UNHCR that they should design mourning processes.
They should in some way facilitate, not require, the possibility of
groups mourning as a function or as a part of them becoming funded.
I think this should be written into the projects.
|