|
Introduction:
Helen Chauncey, of the Coexistence Initiative, explains how identity lies at the heart of many of
today's conflicts. She sees "co-exisence"--the positive embrace of different identities--
as key to those conflicts' resolution.
| |
This rough transcript provides a text alternative to audio. We apologize for occasional errors and unintelligible sections (which are marked with ???).
Diversity
Helen Chauncey
The Coexistence Initiative
| |
 |
Here's what we mean by coexistence as things now stand. This is a work in
progress. We are defining
coexistence by twinning coexistence with diversity. Then we look at diversity
and ask what are the different causes of diversity. There is a long list. That
list includes gender, ethnicity, religious beliefs, and political beliefs. It
can include a variety of ideological differences.
The argument is that much, not all, but much of the conflict in the world today, is in
one way or another, either caused by, or exacerbated by the misuse of identity,
the pitting of different ethnic identities against one another, the pitting
of different religious beliefs, communal faiths against one another. For
that reason, because we think that so much of the conflict that we have in the
world or around us today is tied to that particular subset of the list of things
that defined diversity, it's that subset that we are working on.
What is
coexistence on the basis of defining diversity through ethnicity, religion and
gender? We want to argue that diversity should be viewed in a constructive way.
Resolving conflict in some ways can be defined as creating a neutral space in
which you park your identity at the door. It is our argument that that may be
necessary at a certain stage of a conflict because it is so heated or so violent
that you need to have a cooling off period, but you can't leave your identity
parked at the door indefinitely.
One of the short comings of a very rich, very committed field of conflict
resolution and peace building is that it doesn't have a full set of tools or a
full theoretical awareness of how to bring identity back in. The argument is
that you cannot strip people of their identity. So we wouldn't want to create
some sort of very homogenized thing where everybody was the same color, or some
how the same gender (who knows how that would work?). There would be no sense of
identity. It is part of the human condition to have identity. Our goal is to
create the tool kits, the technical mechanisms, but also the embrace of the
values that leads us to the point where everyone will say, "We want to know
how to embrace diverse identities constructively", or "We don't want
to park our identities at the door."
|