Article Summary of "Some Guidelines for Developing a Creative Approach to Conflict" by Morton Deutsch and Peter T. Coleman
Citation: Deutsch, Morton and Peter T. Coleman. "Some Guidelines for Developing a Creative Approach to Conflict" in The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice, Morton Deutsch and Peter T. Coleman, eds. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 2000, pp. 355-365.
This Article Summary written by: Conflict Research Consortium Staff
Drawing on the work of Howard Gruber, the authors
discuss the relation creativity and conflict, and offer suggestions for
fostering creative approaches to resolving conflicts.
Gruber maintains that creativity requires conflict. Conflict
can be a source of dissatisfaction with the status quo, and provide motivation
to acknowledge and address problems. The authors note however that situations of
conflict are unlikely to lead to creative change if they are threatening or
tense. "To entertain novel idea that may at first seem wild and implausible, to
question initial assumptions of the framework within which the problem or
conflict occurs, the individual needs the freedom or courage to express herself
without fear of censure."(p. 356)
Creativity requires adopting a novel point of view that
stimulated new questions. Conflict theorists, for example, stress the importance
of a point of view that sees conflicts as mutual problems of conflicting
parties. Reframing conflicts in this way is both an exercise in creativity, and
tends to promote further creativity by fostering a less threatening
collaborative resolution process. Reframing, or more generally adopting a novel
point of view, requires various cognitive resources and skills such as a breadth
of experience, the ability to make remote associations, and most especially,
intellectual playfulness. Conditions that support these skills and abilities
also support creativity.
Gruber stresses that, contrary to popular opinion, creative
insight does not come in a swift flash. Creative thinkers typically devote
significant amounts of time and effort to the creative process. This is
certainly also true of creative conflict resolution. Many complex conflicts
require extended time and effort in order to be resolved.
Gruber has also found that groups do not necessarily have an
advantage over individuals in terms of creativity. Individual creativity is
exercised by imagining different perspectives. Groups act creatively by
cooperating to share their members' different perspectives. The authors conclude
that "individual work is apt to be more creative if it is difficult to establish
effective cooperation, while collaborative work is apt to be so if there is
effective cooperation and the collaborators have more resources available to
them than are available to an individual."(p. 358)
Deutsch and Coleman formulate seven general guidelines for
fostering creative conflict. The first thing to do is challenge common myths
that block creativity. These myths include notions that creativity is a rare,
inborn talent, that it is too mysterious to be learned, that it is a kind of
insanity, or that equate creativity with being artistic. The second suggestion
is to create a space-time oasis for creativity; pick a new environment and set
aside enough time for the parties to open up, and then work persistently on
their solution. Third, cultivate a serious but playful atmosphere. Parties in
conflict may be serious to the point of being grim. Explain that people can be
playful while still recognizing the importance of their task.
Another suggestion is to strive for optimal tension: enough
that the parties are motivated to work on a problem, but not so much that they
become defensive and rigid. It is particularly important for conflict managers
to learn to assess tension levels, and learn skills for adjusting tension
levels. The fifth guideline is to foster people's self-confidence. Confident
people are more willing to take risks, and consider novel, even outlandish
ideas. Next, structure the creative process so that it alternates between open
and closed modes of thought. Open thinking generates a variety of options.
Closed thinking tries to narrow the field of options. People in competitive
conflicts tend toward closed thinking, and so conflict managers may need to
reorient them toward more open modes of thought. People in cooperative conflicts
have a lesser tendency toward closed thinking. Finally, the first task of
creative thinkers is to adequately define their problem.
The authors also suggest techniques for stimulating novel
ideas. Brainstorming is a common technique. Thinking in terms of metaphor or
analogies can be fruitful. Parties can rearrange, add and subtract, magnify or
reduce various elements of the situation to generate new options. Parties may be
asked to imagine their desired future. Third parties may introduce new
ideas.
|