Beyond Intractability
Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version
Beyond Intractability Content Selection Criteria and Disclaimer
 

Beyond Intractability "link to" resources are intended as "food for thought" and the views presented are the views of the author(s) and not necessarily the Conflict Information Consortium.  
 
Ideas for improving governance tend to be controversial since different governance processes tend to produce different policy outcomes.  Understandably, people tend to favor those processes that produce the outcomesthat they favor regardless of the quality of the process or the possibility that the process will fail them at some future time.  In examining the various resources available through Beyond Intractability, we ask you to go beyond such a relatively narrow, self-interest-based assessment of each idea.  Instead, we ask you to think about what approaches are more likely, in case after case, to produce outcomes that are effective, efficient, and equitable in advancing the interests of the larger society.

In doing so we urge you to take advantage of Beyond Intractability's various online discussion and comment opportunities to engage in real debate about the relative advantages and disadvantages of each idea.
 

 

Beyond Intractability
Copyright © 2003-2012 The Beyond Intractability Project, The Conflict Information Consortium, University of Colorado;
Beyond Intractability is a Registered Trademark of the University of Colorado

The Beyond Intractability Knowledge Base Project
Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess, Co-Directors and Editors
c/o Conflict Information Consortium (Formerly Conflict Research Consortium), University of Colorado
580 UCB, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA -- Phone: (303) 492-1635 -- Contact
University of Colorado Boulder